Patients served
17,355
This page is the public reference for how Nivaran Foundation describes healthcare delivery quality inside Project Sanjeevani. It exists so partners, donors, journalists, and advisors can see the operating logic behind the outreach model rather than relying on generic nonprofit language.
Today, Sanjeevani has 16 and 17,355 across 7. The care model is designed to bridge first-contact access gaps while maintaining a disciplined view of what mobile camps can and cannot responsibly do.
Patients served
17,355
Verified camps
16
Coverage
7
Public summary
17,355 patients served across 16 completed health camps and 16 rural municipalities.
The outreach model is best understood as an access-and-triage system: it brings first-contact care closer to remote communities, surfaces unmet need, and routes cases forward when field resolution is not enough.
Healthcare delivery starts before a camp day. Site selection, local coordination, scheduling, and outreach all shape whether care actually reaches the intended community.
A field camp works as an access point. Patients are registered, screened, and routed through the camp flow so basic clinical demand is surfaced in a structured way.
Project Sanjeevani is publicly described as delivering free screenings, maternal-care support, disease-prevention services, and basic medicine/checkup support through qualified medical teams.
Not every case can or should be resolved in a mobile camp. Higher-risk or more complex cases must be escalated through referral pathways rather than over-claimed as field resolution.
The public FAQ states that healthcare services are delivered with qualified medical professionals rather than awareness-only activity.
Nivaran publicly states that staff and volunteers receive training, including healthcare-worker training, role-specific preparation, and ongoing support.
The current public position references quality control measures and monitoring of patient outcomes as part of service-quality discipline.
The site states a zero-tolerance position on exploitation and abuse, along with safeguarding measures, reporting mechanisms, and respectful treatment expectations.
Public governance language states that staff, board members, and volunteers are expected to disclose potential conflicts of interest.
The live tracking portal, province coverage pages, financial reports, and leadership/governance pages create a public diligence surface around the care model.
In many rural settings, the first problem is not specialist treatment. It is delay. Distance, transport cost, lost wages, and the absence of routine first-contact care push diagnosis and treatment later than they should be.
The Sanjeevani model exists to reduce that delay. It brings screening, counseling, and early clinical contact closer to the village while making it clearer which cases require referral or continuity beyond the camp itself.
Live program metrics, verified camp history, coverage, and operating data.
Public directory of board, management, and organizational leadership.
How external technical and governance review is being structured.
Reporting and diligence references connected to public trust.
How Nivaran explains disclosure, reporting, and operational accountability.
Background, fact sheet, and citation-ready organization context.