Status
Advisory recruitment in progress
This page explains how Nivaran Foundation is structuring external advisory support across healthcare, education, governance, risk, and institutional accountability.
The advisory network is still being assembled. Until it is finalized, this page serves as the public reference for the kinds of expertise we seek, the standards advisors are expected to pressure-test, and the governance questions we want reviewed with seriousness.
Status
Advisory recruitment in progress
Focus
Healthcare, education, risk, and governance
Use case
Partner diligence and technical review
Contact path
partnerships@nivaranfoundation.org
Advisory pages often become vague placeholders. That is not the goal here. This page is meant to show what Nivaran expects external advisors to challenge: care quality, reporting discipline, governance clarity, and whether public-facing claims match operational reality.
It is also a practical route for funders, institutions, and prospective advisors who want to understand where technical review fits inside the organization before deeper diligence or formal engagement begins.
These are the core areas where Nivaran wants informed outside judgment, especially as visibility, fundraising, and program ambition increase.
Review standards of care, clinical safety, referral discipline, and the practical realities of field delivery in rural settings.
Guide screening logic, prevention priorities, outreach design, and how community trust affects actual healthcare uptake.
Strengthen program thinking around first-contact care, continuity, follow-up, and high-risk populations that need tighter care pathways.
Support the education side of Nivaran's mission and help connect service delivery to longer-term community capacity building.
Bring external scrutiny to donor accountability, conflict management, transparency practices, and governance discipline.
Pressure-test how programs grow, how partnerships are framed, and how institutional credibility is maintained as visibility increases.
Nivaran states that healthcare delivery is carried out with qualified medical professionals rather than awareness-only programming.
Public FAQ references ongoing training, quality control measures, and monitoring of patient outcomes as part of service quality.
Nivaran publicly states that staff, board members, and volunteers are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest.
The site already states a zero-tolerance position on exploitation and abuse, plus training and reporting mechanisms.
Public board, program, finance, fundraising, operations, and communications roles are listed on the leadership page for basic institutional verification.
Financial reporting, accountability references, and the press kit already provide public diligence entry points for external review.
Advisory support should add discipline and judgment around quality, scale, and credibility. It should not duplicate basic management functions already owned by the internal team.
Public directory of board, management, and operational leadership.
Reporting status, compliance references, and donor diligence links.
How disclosure, reporting, and public accountability are described.
Background materials, fact sheet access, and media-facing organizational context.
See the healthcare delivery context advisory review is meant to strengthen.
Public reference for quality control, referral boundaries, and care delivery expectations.
Use the formal contact route for advisory, diligence, or institutional inquiries.